Many Gasheads have serious concerns about how Bristol Rovers is being run, the future of the Memorial Stadium, and whether supporters are being listened to.

This campaign brings those concerns together constructively and independently.

By joining the supporters’ list, you help show the strength of feeling across the fanbase and support a united voice calling for accountability and regular, meaningful communication from the club’s ownership.

What started with a small group of fans has already made an impact.

Imagine what we can achieve together.

Joining is free. No obligation beyond staying informed. Details used only to unify our voices.

FOR THE FANS. BY THE FANS.

Stadium & future: PARTIALLY ANSWERED
Challenges were acknowledged and studies referenced, with £420k spent so far. Redevelopment isn’t ruled out and alternatives are being explored. However after 2.5 years there are still no timelines or clear direction. Back to square one.
Open communication: PARTIALLY ANSWERED
Ownership accept fans want more communication and say they’re open to regular interviews. However, there’s no clear structure, ownership of comms, or strategic vision set out. Promises of ‘more updates’ lack clarity.

Apology & accountability: NOT ANSWERED
There was no personal apology for relegation and no clear acceptance of responsibility from ownership. This priority was not addressed.
Failures & lessons learned: PARTIALLY ANSWERED
Mistakes were acknowledged in general terms, but without detail. No clear explanation of what went wrong last season or how lessons learned will shape future decisions.
Long-term football strategy: PARTIALLY ANSWERED
Improving the football side and infrastructure was referenced, but beyond improving on now, there was no coherent long-term football strategy outlined. Aspirations alone are not a plan.
Financial clarity: PARTIALLY ANSWERED
A top-three League Two budget and a 40–50% reduction in losses were stated. However, there was no clear breakdown of football spend or long-term operating expectations.
Financing capability: NOT ANSWERED
There was no explanation of whether current ownership can realistically fund long-term infrastructure ambitions. This priority remains unanswered.
Investment strategy: NOT ANSWERED
No detail was provided on whether external investment is required, where it would come from, or what level of ownership might be offered. This priority was not addressed.
Training ground: ANSWERED
The training ground was clearly discussed as a long-term asset, with upgrades planned for men’s, women’s and academy football. While detail and timelines are limited, this was the most clearly answered area.
Executive structure: PARTIALLY ANSWERED
There was some acknowledgement of internal structure changes with Bates & Martin, but no commitment to appointing an experienced, full-time football CEO or CFO. This priority remains only partially addressed.